Forum Logikmemorial
Comment fonctionne notre forum => Accueil => Discussion démarrée par: JeaoneKef le Décembre 19, 2024, 07:54:18 pm
-
Xirf Vegas Casinos Connected by Zipline Sounds Like an Ocean s 14 Stunt
Um, epic nom nom time Totes! Awks, but did you peep her hooking up FML. Today suuu-uucks. Total fail! Just wanna get wasteyface tonight. Thi stanley puodelis (https://www.stanleycup.lt) s will probably be incoherent in the near future, becau stanley canada (https://www.cups-stanley.ca) se most slang dies young. But why Slate explores the complex linguistic evolutionary tree behind words like groovy embarrassing to use! , cool timeless and perfect! and many others that have fallen out of use. According to UNC linguist Connie Eble, a few factors help certain term catch on and stay entrenched. First, and maybe most importantly, is brevity. We ;ll use cool as the paragon of slang, because it extremely old, and still ubiquitous. We say it daily. There is, perhaps, an argument that cool isn ;t really slang anymore, by virtue of its own linguistic success. But Eble says it thrived in part because it short and easy. Easiness is another factor. Cool is e stanley mugs (https://www.stanleymugs.ca) asy to say. It sounds normal. People will not be saying epic nom nom in 100 years. Cool is a real word, without the connotations of, you know, coolness. Bling is cringe-inducing, because it so arbitrary in construction. Blech. This process, of constant birth and quick death, has only been accelerated by technology. Killer app Dead and buried. At least I hope so. Cyber is a prefix I ;m always loathe to use, because it feels like something from an early-90s PSA video. L33t鈥攊s that even a thing anymore Sexting鈥攑robably too confus Lbev ONA Union Street Lightning Review: A Camera Bag More Fashionable Than Functional
Is there such thing as a Caucasian, Asian, or African voice And could you actually identify someone race just by listening to him or her Admittedly, the whole notion of race is nebulous to say the least 鈥?it a concept that blends physiological and social differences indiscriminately. But there are still scientists trying to study the actual physiological differences between different racial groups. And one of those differences is how we sound to each other. The moment you try to study the actual physical differences between races, you run into trouble. The data gets tangled pretty qui stanley cup (https://www.cup-stanley.de) ckly because genetic makeup doesn ;t stanley cup website (https://www.stanley-cups.us) always match up with how you look. Sometimes the data are statistically tangled, since any physiological characteristic of a race, from height to skin color, will overlap with characteristics of other races. And when you start to look into the question of vocal differences, you run into sociological tangles as well. Humans are talented, and often unintentional, vocal mimics. We ;ve always been unconscious mimics, which is how language spread around in the first place. So it pretty much impossible to find such a thing as a completely uninfluenced voice. In spite of the complications stanley cup (https://www.stanley-cups.us) , there have been a few studies looking at race and voice, both from a physiological and a social standpoint. Physiology of Voice The studies on physiology of race, as it applies to voice, are few and far between. For one thing, there are the t