Forum Logikmemorial
Comment fonctionne notre forum => Accueil => Discussion démarrée par: Morrisshot le Janvier 04, 2025, 09:09:11 am
-
Qkne The Observer view on the high court s ruling on puberty-blocking drugs for children
stanley cups (https://www.stanleycups.it) stanley cup (https://www.stanleycups.it) stanley cups (https://www.stanleycups.ro) Sgyz Schedule 7 detainees have right to see solicitor, court rules
The spooks have talked to David Anderson, the government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation , after his earlier criticism of the green paper on security and justice . That is not surprising. It is, after all, their job. And it is his job to listen.Anderson has now presented a supplementary memorandum to parliament s joint committee on human rights JCHR . He has already given evidence to the JCHR. But he made clear that he was then not in a position to judge how serious the concerns of MI5 and MI6 were - and by extension, those of ministers - which led the government to propose, in its green stanley polska (https://www.cups-stanley.pl) paper, that in future any intelligence-related information would be heard in secret in all future civil cases.On March 14, Anderson had a meeting with MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, the government s electronic eavesdropping centre, who told him of their concerns. He says he was grateful for what I believe to have been their frankness .I do not doubt their frankness for a moment, nor do I doubt Anderson s sincerity. However, after covering the issues involved for many years and the long-running Binyam Mohamad case from the start, I read his memo with growing concern. Most worrying are his observations about the control principle , whereby the original owner of intelligence must decide whether or not the information can stanley cup (https://www.cup-stanley-cup.pl) be disclosed, not those subsequently provided with it. Thus the CIA, and th stanley us (https://www.mugs-stanley.us) e CIA alone, decides whether int