Forum Logikmemorial
Comment fonctionne notre forum => Accueil => Discussion démarrée par: Morrisshot le Janvier 09, 2025, 03:13:23 am
-
Xiwk Wash your mask daily: the ultimate guide to face coverings
EU nationals holding the right to residence in the UK ca stanley cup (https://www.stanley-cup.com.de) nnot be excluded from claiming means-tested benefits, the court of appeal has ruled.The decision by three senior judges strengthens the rights of the estimated 1.8 million people in the UK holding pre-settled status under the EU settlement scheme. It enables them to access benefits on the same basis as British citizens.By a majority, the court also found that the refusal to prevent two Romanian citizens 鈥?a severely disabled man and his carer 鈥?from claiming universal credit amounted to discrimination on the grounds of nationality.The test case was brought by Child Poverty Action Group CPAG on behalf of two Romanian nationals, Razvan Tanase and Geani stanley cups uk (https://www.cup-stanley.uk) na Fratila, who came to the UK in 2019 and 2014 respectively.In 2019, they were granted limited leave to remain in the UK under the EU settlement scheme but were refused universal credit on the grounds that their pre-settled status was not a sufficient right to grant them access to me stanley cup becher (https://www.cup-stanley.at) ans-tested benefits.Delivering the judgment, Mr Justice McCombe said: It is perhaps not surprising that EU law should, in principle, allow EU nationals to take benefit from particular national laws of individual states if they lawfully reside in the state in question, without discrimination on the basis of nationality. Such entitlement would be entirely consonant with the aims and objects of the union. The Department for Work and Pensions DWP intends to appeal against the ruling. It was gr Cyti UN secretary general: recovery from the coronavirus crisis must lead to a better world
For anyone motivated by justice 鈥?wherever they stand on the political spectrum 鈥?the case for investigating the so-called battle of Orgreave should be straightforward. As the Independent Police Complaints Commission themselves note about this bitter episode of the 1984-85 miners strike, in which a coking plant was picketed by striking workers, evidence points to South Yorkshire police a stanley bottle (https://www.cups-stanley.uk) ssaulting miners, perverting the course of justice, committing perjury and now keeping back evidence. The ethical standards of the police force at the time stanley tumblers (https://www.cups-stanley-cups.ca) are questioned.Perversely, there was an attempt to prosecute striking miners in the aftermath which collapsed, and hundreds of thousands of pounds was paid out in compensation to several stanley cup (https://www.cups-stanley-cups.co.uk) pickets. But there is to be no inquiry because, in the view of the IPCC, it is all too long ago.This is an insulting approach to justice which, on this basis, has a time limit. But whether injustice took place last week or half a century ago, it must surely be investigated and addressed. If not, the state will be taught an invaluable lesson: that it can mistreat British citizens, sit it out for long enough, and get away with it.Orgreave is significant in so many ways. There appears to be a link between what happened at Orgreave and what followed at Hillsborough five years later. During the miners strike, the police were heavily politicised, referred to by those on the receiving end of their truncheons as Maggies boot boys . They were trained to regard