Eibm Look beyond legal discovery when designing e-mail archives, urge experts
Sometimes the latest isn
stanley cup becher 039;t the greatest p:bigbite/multi-title ndash;gt;Technology pundit types like me are always blabbering about bleeding-edge technology. Wow! A holographic wristwatch that lets Princess Leia tell you the time! A browser plug-in that ignores your email so you donrsquo;t have to! A wireless camera fork that automatically tweets pictures of your lunch!Unfortunately, some bleeding-edge technology you read about never ships. And even if it does ship, most new tech products are never taken up by most people. If few people use revolutionary technology, wherersquo the revolution, really For example, wersquo;ve been talking about wirele
owala water bottle ss charging of mobile phones for years. And devices that do that are available. But of the 100 people you know best, how many of them use this technology One Zero The tech press and blogosphere creates the illusion that the newest technology is always best. But this isnrsqu
hydrojug traveler o;t true. The best technology is the one that makes your life better mdash; no matter how new it is. Because of our bias in favor of super advanced hardware and software, we too often shun some of the greatest technology because itrsquo not the latest technology. Herersquo some low-tech tech that everyone should embrace. Dash camsHave you seen that video of jetliner debris exploding across a Russian highway after a plane crash To the average U.S. viewer, the coincidence seems incredible. But the reality is that dash cams mdash Bdhr Novell may make more acquisitions to fill product line
Farpoint Group ndash; While security remains at the top of ITrsquo list of issues with wireless LANs, I think wersquo;ll soon see attention shift to what really is a much more significant question more significant than securit
polene borsa y Indeed! ndash; and thatrsquo the question of total cost of ownership, or TCO. Irsquo;ve found just about every other issue pales when money becomes the topic of conversation, and itrsquo really a positive trend that wersquo;re now getting lot
stanley kubek s of questions about how to cost-justify a WLAN. Few enterprises ndash; less than 10% ndash; today use WLANs on a mission-critical basis in general-office applications. Thatrsquo going to change dramatically this year, as prices have
owala deutschland fallen, performance has improved, security yes! has been addressed, and clients become almost free. But how do we go about evaluating the TCO of WLANs The first step is to develop a model of cost of ownership. This involves breaking cost down into two major components: capital expense, or CAPEX , and operational expense or OPEX . CAPEX includes the cost of any equipment involved, and OPEX includes installation, maintenance, and ongoing operations. Over time, OPEX is much more important than CAPEX, since CAPEX is a function of the always-declining costs of hardware and software, while OPEX usually reflects labor costs, and these only grow over time. Nonetheless, both can be favorably addressed, and the TCO of a WLAN infrastructure successfully managed and justi
