Shzt EPA hails revitalized enforcement efforts as Biden administration heads to exit
Air New Zealand and Pratt Whitney have broken ground on an extension to their joint Christchurch Engine Centre, with an aim to boost MRO capacity for PW1100G engines.The new 14,000sq m 151,000sq ft extension will be able to handle 140 overhauls annually by 2032, say the two companies in a joint statement.Source: Air New Zealand/Pratt WhitneyA rendering of the Christchurch Engine Centre expansionConstruction will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2026.The location has been in service since 1
stanley cup 948. In 2001 Air NZ and PW formed a joint venture for the MRO of JT8D engines, which were followed by IAE International V2500s, of which 1,500 have been overhauled. The Christchurch Engine Centre has a proven track record of delivering exceptional performance and quality with a highly capable workforce, says Shane Eddy, president, Pratt Whitney.
stanley romania With the Asia-Pacific region projected to experience the highest aviation growth globally over the next 20 years, it is a strategic imperative for us to invest here and partner with Air New Zealand as we continue to expand the [geared turbofan] MRO network in support of the growing fleet. The PW1100G powers Air NZs A320neo family air
stanley becher craft, but the engine has proved troublesome for the carrier.In the six months to 30 June 鈥?the last half of its 2024 financial year 鈥?the airline said that up to six PW1100Gs were out of service at any given time. This accounted for one third of the airlines 18 strong A320neo family fleet.N Blxa Technical problems force Maine DOT to reapply for $3M in federal grants
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on聽bangordailynewsJohn J. Pitney Jr. is a professor of American politics at Claremont McKenna College. From 1989-91, he was deputy director of research at th
stanley mugs e Republican National Committee.Some right-leaning voters who oppose Donald Trump are thinking of voting neither for him nor Kamala Harris.I understand how they feel. In 2016, I published an article urging Never Trump conservatives to consider casting their ballot for a third-party candidate. In the election that year, I did just that.I regret writing that column. I regret casting that vote.To people like me, Trump represented a
stanley nz repudiation of everything that Ronald Reagan stood for. But as a conservative and former GOP staffer who had never voted for a Democratic presidential candidate, I harbored reservations about Hillary Clinton.Voting for neither Trump nor Clinton seemed to be a safe way to express disapproval of both. Most polls at the time showed her on track to win comfortably. It seemed reason
stanley cups uk able to argue that a significant tally for a third-party candidate might check her liberal ambitions. After all, the number of votes for independent candidate Ross Perot in 1992 may have nudged Bill Clinton to accept bigger budget cuts than he wanted.But the 2016 election did not go according to expectations. Despite losing the national popular vote, Trump squeaked into
