Sgot N-Korean editorial accuses Trump of criminal offence calls for death sentence
ISLAMABAD:The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Rawalpindi on M
nike air af1 onday filed a reference against officers and officials involved in the illegal award of lease for Railway Golf Club Lahore in聽Islamabad's accountability court.According to NAB, the reference has been filed against聽accused Senator Javed Ashraf Qazi, who is the former federal minister for communication and railways.Along with Qazi, General (retd) Saeed-uz-Zafar who is the current Chairman Railways Board, Major General (retd) Hamid Hassan Butt and聽former gene
air max hombre ral manager of Pakistan Railways Iqbal Samad Khan.Along with these, Khurshid
adidas spezial rot Ahmed Khan, Brig (retd) Akhtar Ali Baig, Abdul Ghaffar, Ramzan Sheikh and Pervaiz Qureshi are also named in the reference. Sheikh and Qureshi are sponsors of Royal Palm Golf Club.Around 17 years ago, Pakistan Railways offered the lease of its golf club at Canal Bank, Lahore for 33 years for which a number of firms submitted bids including MAX Corps.JIT probe limited to documents obtained from S Ovlp Wholesale and retail terrorism
KARACHI:The Supreme Court (SC) stayed on Friday the construction of a commercial plaza on the site of f
nike air max97 ormer Chandni Cinema.A two-judge bench, headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed, also issued notices to the chief secretary, advocate-general, a representative of the revenue board and others.During Friday's proceedings, the petitioner, Rashid Khan, argued that the plot of Chandni Cinema was an amenity plot on which the construction of a high rise commercial building was illegal. The petitioner also alleged that some officials of the Sindh Building Control Au
campus 00s adidas thority (SBCA) and Karachi Building Control Authority had been conniving in the illegal construction.After listening to
adidas forum bold the petitioner's stance, Justice Ahmed asked how an amenity plot was converted into a commercial one.Do not want to run government from courts, says SC judgeA defence lawyer, however, contended that the plot had never had the status of an amenity plot, to which the bench replied that the matter will be decided once docume