Auteur Sujet: ihhw Watch The Expletive-Laden Teaser For Future Shock! The Story of 2000 AD  (Lu 4 fois)

MethrenRaf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 133890
    • cctj Is your brain actually running a computer algorithm while you sleep
Jpef Almanac: Vietnam Veterans Memorial
 CHEYENNE, Wyo. - Conservatives who say welfare recipients should have to pass a drug test to receive government assistance have momentum on their side.The issue has come up in the Republican presidential campaign, with front-runner Mitt Romney saying it s an  excellent idea. Nearly two dozen states are considering plans this session that would make drug testing mandatory for welfare recipients, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. And Wyoming lawmakers advanced such a proposal this week.Driving the measures is a perception that people on public assistance are misusing the funds and that cutting off the stanley deutschland ir benefits would save money for tight state budgets  151; even as statistics have largely proved both notions untrue. The idea, from Joe Taxpayer is, `I don t mind helping you out, but you need to show that you re looking for stanley cup  work, or better yet that you re employed, and that you re drug and alcohol free,   said Wyom stanley water bottle ing Republican House Speaker Ed Buchanan on Friday.        Supporters are pushing the measures despite warnings from opponents that courts have struck down similar programs, ruling that the plans amount to an unconstitutional search of people who have done nothing more than seek help. This legislation assumes suspicion on this group of people. It assumes that they re drug abusers,  said Wyoming Democratic Rep. Patrick Goggles during a heated debate on the measure late Thursday.The proposals aren t new, according to the NCSL. About three dozen Zlna We Can Now Read About Ginny Weasley   s Post-Hogwarts Career
 A controversial new theory claims that many features of the human face are the result of evolved defensive measures against fist fights.     This is not the first time that fist-fighting has been implicated in the development of our physiologies. Back in 2012, scient stanley tazas ists made the claim that fists chang stanley vaso ed the course of human evolution, arguing that It is 8230;our most important anatomical weapon, used to threaten, beat and sometimes kill to resolve conflict. The paper earned its f stanley spain air share of criticism, not only because the evidence was circumstantial, but because of its claim that violence underpinned much of human evolution 鈥?a perspective many now consider to be outdated, simplistic, and overly male-oriented  for example, some facial features could be the result of sexual selection . The new theory about human faces, which has been published in Biological Reviews, threatens to do the same. Did fist fighting change the course of human evolution   The Protective Buttressing Hypothesis According to David Carrier and Michael Morgan, our distant human ancestors exhibited a remarkable number of features that can only be described as protective buttressing. Indeed, when hominids engage in hand-to-hand combat, the face is typically the primary target. The bones in our face, say the scientists, suffer the highest rates of fracture 鈥?but they ;re also parts of the skull that have exhibited the greatest increase in robusticity during the course of our evolution as