Szch Amazon s New Kindle Avalanche: Everything You Need to Know
Fermilab believed they hit the motherlode this past April after findings from the Tevatron particle accelerator suggested a new subatomic particle was out there. A second, independent group has analyzed that same data and claim there is no new particle.
https://gizmod stanley cups o/have-scientists-discovered-a-new-elementary-particle-5789701 The research team DZero has a detector of their own in a different section of the Tevatron, and have been poring over their own data from the same experiments. Originally, Fermilab pointed to a bump in energy levels that was inconsistent with expected behavior for particles involved in the experiment. DZero says that bump didn ;t exist in their findings. One of the earliest theories attempting to explain this discrepancy is how the experiment was modeled. If the analytical equations were off from the start, then it would provide faulty results. DZero considers this a possibility. Fermilab thinks there not much of a difference between the two sets of results, but they have yet to read DZero paper. The ultimate decider of this debate will likely be the Large Hadron Collider. Many in the science community expect the experiment to be replicated on the larger proton accelerator, which could provide definitive results anywhere between the next 3-18 months. [New Scientist via Slashdot]
stanley kaffeebecher AtomsfermilabHi
stanley mugs ggs bosonParticle physicsparticlesPhysics Alfl An LED Helmet For The Techno Viking
If you can make it here, you can make it anywhere, baby! The Empire State is now the home of a whole new kind of dreamer, after a judge ruled merely looking
stanley website at child pornography online is no crime. What. The case, which centered around a professor who had viewed hundred of child porn pics, found that he did no wrong because there was no Right Click > Save As. The mere contact of kiddie porn to eyeballs over the internet鈥攈undreds of times over鈥攚as the same as looking at a picture of a lolcat. Th
stanley drinking cup is seems impossibly horrible and
stanley uk wrong, but, technically, the ruling is sound, MSNBC reports: Merely viewing Web images of child pornography does not, absent other proof, constitute either possession or procurement within the meaning of our Penal Law, Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for a majority of four of the six judges. Instead, you actually need to deliberately save child porn to your hard drive, or some other explicit HELLO YES I AM CONSUMING KIDDIE PORN action, including鈥攕eriously鈥攑rinting it out: Rather, some affirmative act is required printing, saving, downloading, etc. to show that defendant in fact exercised dominion and control over the images that were on his screen, Ciparick wrote. To hold otherwise, would extend the reach of state law to conduct viewing that our Legislature has not deemed criminal. Ciparick follows the logical extension of this legislative absurdity and then does no
