Xzfo What and when MI5 knew about torture
Expec
stanley tumbler t something on Wednesday, some gesture in the spring statement to ease the gathering cost-of-living storm. But for whom Thats the chancellors political and moral choice. But, before he chooses, I would like to bring him with me to sit in court to watch a day of housing evictions, warrants and reposse
stanley cup ssions.Since the ban on evictions in England during Covid ended last summer, a wave of cases has surged through the justice system. Here Rishi Sunak would see stricken households losing their daily battle to stay afloat in a sea of bills and misfortunes. Many were knocked into debt by lost earnings in the pandemic, struggling against mounting bills. Many were just about managing with the 拢20 a week uplift to universal credit, before that was cruelly withdrawn.In Watford county court, Hertfordshire, some of them find their last hope in Ruth Camp, a duty solicitor and housing specialist who works for Shelter, the housing charity. They spill out their story briefly to her before they go into the courtroom, where she argues their case before the judge, doing the best she can on the day. Some tenants, having already given up in despair, never even turn up. Often she does win
stanley cup adjournments and delays, finding technical errors in landlords paperwork or gaining a legal breathing space for those with mental health problems. Years of legal aid cuts have left just one law firm still taking housing cases in all of Hertfordshire, she says, while landlords often have barristers. The Uvsp Idaho judge says rape is a direct consequence of the social media system
At key moments in history, courts around the world have helped to accelerate social change 鈥?they have vindicated the demands of people fighting to end slavery, racial segregation and gender inequality. It should therefore come as no surprise that they are being called on to help resolve the biggest social and environmental crisis of our time: the climate emergency.The case against the government of the Netherlands powerfully illustrates what climate litigation can achieve. In 2015, the Hague district court issued a groundbreaking decision in response to a lawsuit filed by the Urgenda Foundation and 886 Dutch citizens, arguing that the government was failing to reduce greenhouse gas
vaso stanley emissions quickly enough. The court agreed that the governments actions were unlawful and ordered it to slash the Netherlands emissions by 2020. That decision was upheld by a court of appeal and ultimately by the supreme court of the Netherlands in 2019.Its hard to overstate the imp
stanley uk act: in response, the government has taken huge steps to reduce emissions, including closing or significantly reducing the capacity of coal-fired power plants and overseeing 鈧?bn worth of low-carbon investment. The first judgment also spurred public debate that led to a new Climate Change Act. But the value of the litigation was just as clear in the hushed, crowded courtroom in the Hague. People waited for the countrys highest court to validate what they instinctively kn
stanley termoska ew to be true: that governments cannot know the ri
