Gjxx Big questions about cyberwar
During the past two years, many companies have moved toward a hybrid-workplace model without any formal policies in place. That needs to change. Chances are, you donrsquo;t have a hybrid work policy. Many companies donrsquo;t ha
stanley cup becher ve any written policy for working outside the office. Those that do probably have a remote work policy.Going without any policy at all is ill-advised. Policies protect the company, impro
stanley cup ve morale, foster better culture, help employee retention, improve cybersecurity, and provide other benefits.And remote work policies crafted just a couple of years ago are likely obsolete for most companies now. The concept of having an employee handbook for regular employees who work in the office, plus a remote work policy for that minority that works from home, is now antiquated in the extreme.Yes, some employees are explicitly categorized as hybrid or flex workers, spending some days in the office and some days at home. But even those labeled as on-site workers are likely to do some work outside of the office, after hours, and on weekends. Staffers may take
polene workcations, or do work in other countries for short periods of time. And some specific employees may rotate in and out of the office, remote, and hybrid categories.The possibilities for where employees do their jobs are endless. And thatrsquo why you need a single policy for all employeesmdash;a hybrid work policy. What your hybrid wor Wdaj E-discovery: Combing the cloud for the information you need
Stays injunction that was to take effect Oct. 10 while appeal moves forward A federal appeals court late today granted Microsoftrsquo request to suspend an injunction that would have barred the company from selling its Word software next month.In a short order filed near the end of the day, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Di
polene borse strict approved Microsoftrsquo earlier request for a stay of the injunction.Without prejudicing the ulti
polene fr mate determination of this case by the merits panel, the court determines based upon the motion papers submitted that Microsoft has met its burden to obtain a stay of the injunction, the court said. The injunction would have prevented Microsoft from selling Word 2003 and Word 2007 in their current forms after Oct 10, and
polene borsa was ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Leonard Davis on Aug. 11, after the company was found guilty in May by a Texas jury of infringing a patent held by Canadian software developer i4i. Davis also awarded i4i more than $290 million in damages and interest.On Aug. 18, Microsoft filed a motion to stay the injunction while it took the case to appeal. In that motion, Microsoft warned of massive disruptions to its sales, as well as those of important OEM partners such as Dell and Hewlett-Packard, if the injunction was not put on hold.Microsoft also said that the injunction, and the resulting need to retool Word to remove the infringing custom XML feature, could keep Word 2003 and Word 2
