Iokx MPS town hall tonight: 4-day school week, proposal to break up school district
At the Supreme Court Tuesday, justices quizzed lawyers about an obscure 19th century law that has become the next front in the legal contest over abortion rights. How do you respond to an argument that mailing your product and advertising it would violate the Comstock Act Justice Clarence Thomas asked Jessica Ellsworth, the attorney representing New York-based Danco Laboratories 鈥?maker of the abortion drug mifepristone, the FDA approval of which the court is reviewing.That the Supreme Court is paying attention shows how provisions of a law some considered d
stanley cup ead can return to the legal front lines, said Mary Ziegler, a University of California at Davis law professor who has written about the act.In the two years since the courts decision in D
botella stanley obbs vs. Jackson Womens Health Organization overturned Roe vs. Wade its become clear that federal legislation banning abortion outright has little chance of passing the U.S
stanley website . Senate 鈥?where Democrats and some Republicans oppose such restrictions 鈥?without a political sea change.Anti-abortion groups hope they can use long-unenforced language from Comstock to fight abortion rights in the courts, and under future Republican presidential administrations to restrict the distribution of medications used in abortions. It s sort of emerged, as I would say, as probably the dominant stopgap anti-abortion strategy, Ziegler said. The second act of a moral crusade The Comstock Act passed in 1873 at the urging of anti-vice crusader Anthony Comsto Ulvg Cancer-causing chemical found in Proactiv, PanOxyl, Target acne creams
stanley cup stanley fr stanley cup