Gusg Chuck Schumer Is a Last-Minute No on Trump s North American Trade Deal, Citing Lack of Climate Progress
out this week shows. In 2015, journalists obtained a trove of internal documents related to ExxonMobils work on climate change and published a series of investigations into how the companys external PR didnt match its internal research. Exxon Knew, which refers to the idea that Exxon knew about climate change and its dangers while continui
stanley cup ng to mislead the public and per
stanley cup petuating climate denial, has become a catchphrase of the climate movement. Much of the subsequent reporting and research into the uncovered Exxon documents has focused on how Exxon funded and encouraged climate denial while sitting on concrete knowledge of how its product causes climate change. But Exxon wasnt just listening to external scientists鈥攖he company had its own scientists working on creating models and projections. And until this week, no one had actually taken the models out for a test drive to see how they performed. As a paper published Thursday in the journal Science shows, it turns out they performed scarily well. We knew Ex
stanley cup xon knew, but this is like Exxon knew 2.0, said Geoffrey Supran, the studys lead author and an associate professor at the University of Miami. It produces an airtight and statistically rigorous insight into what [Exxon] knew in a way that is academically intriguing but also practically useful. As Supran told Earther, the genesis for this study actually happened on Twitter. After the Exxon documents became public and Supran and others began publishing peer-reviewed Pngf Don t Panic : Snakehunt Continues After Three-Foot Python Escapes Inside High School
Ideas about remote-controlled warfare have be
stanley mug en around for over a century. And here in the 2010s were acutely aware that wars can be fought from halfway around the world. If our generation is remembered for anything, it might be for our introduction of drone into the international lexicon. But the thing that we so often forget is that the people who built remote-controlled war machines in the interwar period between the end of WWI and the beginning of WWII thought they were doing humanity a favor. There are countless visions of radio-controlled tanks, unmanned aerial vehicles, and even gigantic robot fighters from the early 20th century. But the thing that might be most shocking to readers here in the early 21st century is that these empty vehicles were all supposed to be fighting amongst themselves. Th
stanley cup e gigantic robots of 1934 were explicitly envisioned to fight our battles and whatever robot won, that nation would be declared the victor. You also see this in the visions of robot tanks. From the April 1931 issue of Radio-Craft magazine emphasis mine : Writers of war stories, peering into the future, predict an approaching era when fighting will be done by machinery under remote control.
stanley thermos Guns automatically operated will fire from deserted fortifications and from tanks which contain no living operators. Airplanes without human pilots will observe positions through televisors, and drop projectiles guided from a post at headquarters, many miles away. The casualties wi
