Jpiq PPP PML-N sort out portfolios in Balochistan
RAWALPINDI:The special court recently formed to hear cases registered under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 on Friday (today) will record testimonies of three more witnesses against PTI Chairman Imran Khan and his fellow party leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi in the diplomatic cipher case in Rawalpindi rsquo s Adiala Jail.Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain of the special court will hear the matter. Imran and Qureshi will appear before the court.The defence lawyers will cross-examine the state witness
air fone one es.There are a total of 28 official witnesses in the case. After the testimonies of three more witnesses
white dunks are recorded, 22 will be left.The cipher case pertains to a document waved by Imran, the then prime minister, at a public rally in March last year, terming it as evidence of a foreign conspiracy behind the no-confidence motion he faced at the time. The motion was carried a few weeks later, leading to the toppling of Imran 39 s gover
air max plus nment.Imran was accused of violating the prime minister 39 s oath Name Over 100k fined for careless driving in 2019 in Islamabad
ISLAMABAD:The Supreme Court (SC) suspended on Tuesday the Balochistan High Court 39 s (BHC) judgment wherein several provisions of th
air jordan aj1 e Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Act, 2015 were declared unconstitutional.In a petition filed by DHA Quetta, a three-member bench of the apex court comprising JusticesUmar Ata Bandial, Qazi Amin Ahmed and Mazahir Hussain Naqvi granted
air fone one leave to appeal against the BHC judgment.A full court of the BHC comprising all its five judges had declared several provisions of the DHA Act, 2015 unconstitutional.The high court had declared that the DHA was like a non-government agency and therefore, acquisition of property by it wou
nike af ld violate the constitutional right to property.It had also held that the DHA could not be allowed to develop its own master plans or perform other municipal functions.The power of the authority to declare a specified area in which development could be carried out was also held unconstitutional.The BHC judgment had resulted inall developmen
