Xqnp Obama and Netanyahu agree: Iranian nuclear program is a top priority
While President Trump has made clear to the world that his administration will not support the Paris climate agreement, former Vice President Al Gore says he still has hope as
vaso stanley a surge of activism has sprung up in reaction to Mr. Trump s policies. Stunning photos of climate change 72 photos Even though President Trump announced he was going to pull out of the Paris agreement, the very next day the world doubled down on their commitment, said Gore on CBS This Morning on Wednesday. Gore applauded t
stanley us he work of state governors and local mayors who are committed to combatting the effects of climate change, saying, It now looks as if the U.S. has an excellent chance to meet our commitments under the agreement, regardless of President Trump. He said, however, even with the commitment of world leaders across the globe, it s still not enough, but the support lays a strong foundation on which to build stronger action. The world would benefit from U.S. leadership, but Tump is on ot
stanley canada her side of that, added Gore. It s been over a decade since Gore s film, An Inconvenient Truth was released, highlighting the imminent impacts of climate change, and now, Gore says, extreme weather conditions linked to these Zubp NYPD chief: This is a time of great pressure on cops
VOTER ID....In the LA Times today, law professor Daniel Tokaji asks if voter ID laws, like the Indiana law that s being challenged in the Supreme Court, are a new poll tax :This burden that Indiana s law imposes might be defensible if the state had evidence that ID is needed to prevent polling place fraud, but that evidence simply doesn t exist. The state of Indiana couldn t document a single case of voter impersonation at the polls. In other words, voter ID is a solution in search of a problem.....In challenging this law, voting rights advocates rely on a 1966 case that struck down poll taxes, which were used to disenfranchise African Americans in some Southern states. In that opinion, the Supreme Court held that even a $1.50 poll tax discriminated against voters based on their economic status. The court declared that restrictions on the right to vote must be closely scrutinized and carefully confin
stanley drink bottle ed. Some are optimistic that the Supreme Court will follow this precedent and strike down Indiana s law, thereby placing comparably strict laws in jeopardy....[But] just last year, it lifted a court order against an Arizona voter ID law that required photo ID or two forms of non-photo ID. That opinio
vaso stanley n turned the right to vote on its head. The court suggested that the mere perception of voter fraud was equivalent to vote dilution. According to the
starbucks stanley cup court, citizens might feel disenfranchised if they believe, correctly or not, that others are committing vote fraud.Indiana couldn
