Qkne The Observer view on the high court s ruling on puberty-blocking drugs for children
stanley cups stanley cup stanley cups Sgyz Schedule 7 detainees have right to see solicitor, court rules
The spooks have talked to David Anderson, the government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation , after his earlier criticism of the green paper on security and justice . That is not surprising. It is, after all, their job. And it is his job to listen.Anderson has now presented a supplementary memorandum to parliament s joint committee on human rights JCHR . He has already given evidence to the JCHR. But he made clear that he was then not in a position to judge how serious the concerns of MI5 and MI6 were - and by extension, those of ministers - which led the government to propose, in its green
stanley polska paper, that in future any intelligence-related information would be heard in secret in all future civil cases.On March 14, Anderson had a meeting with MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, the government s electronic eavesdropping centre, who told him of their concerns. He says he was grateful for what I believe to have been their frankness .I do not doubt their frankness for a moment, nor do I doubt Anderson s sincerity. However, after covering the issues involved for many years and the long-running Binyam Mohamad case from the start, I read his memo with growing concern. Most worrying are his observations about the control principle , whereby the original owner of intelligence must decide whether or not the information can
stanley cup be disclosed, not those subsequently provided with it. Thus the CIA, and th
stanley us e CIA alone, decides whether int
