Tiqk Has the UK used budget day to bury news of deportations
Less than 20% of people in England fully self-isolate when asked to do so, according to documents released from the governments scientific advisory group for emergencies, which said mass testing would be of no use unless this percentage rose.The report from scientists on Sage suggests they think there are limited benefits to mass testing, which was proposed in the
stanley mugs leaked Operation Moonshot documents.Boris Johnson viewed moonshot as our only hope for avoiding a second national lockdown before a vaccine , a leaked memo said. The 拢100bn plan for up to 10m tests a day were sent to Sa
stanley cup ge and the Treasury in August.The latest Sage minutes published on the governments website feature a group of scientists set up specifically to look at mass testing, although they do not mention moonshot by name.The minutes, from a meeting on 27 August of the Multidisciplinary Task and Finish Group on Mass Testing, make it clear that the scienti
stanley mug sts think mass testing is of limited use. They think it could have unforeseen consequences, such as stigmatising deprived areas where many people of colour live which turn out to have higher infection rates. This has the potential to fuel existing racial tensions, they warn, although, if carefully done, it could help bring in support for those areas.But their biggest concern is that too few people are self-isolating already, even if they have tested positive. Mass testing will require high rates of testing and self-isolation > 90% achieved equitably in Stmb A career change saved my life : the people who built better lives after burnout
How we think about rape matters. It determines h
stanley cup ow we talk about rape, it determines how the media writes about rape and, ultimately, it determ
mugs stanley ines what we as a society do about rape.And right now, we are not doing enough.According to the Centers for Disease Control, almost 20% of women in the US report being sexually assaulted in their lifetimes 鈥?thats one in every five 鈥?and 40% of victims were raped between the ages of 18 and 24. Fully 20% of undergraduate women 鈥?again, one in every five university women 鈥?report being victims of rape or attempted rape during their time at college. And we all know that these numbers dont reflect the full universe of sexual assault victims, because many victims 鈥?including many men 鈥?never report. So you might think that someone given a platform at the New York Times, like Yale law professor Jed Rubenfeld was in Sundays paper, might have done more than simply note that women are attacked in appalling numbers and colleges mishandle rape cases.Instead, what followed that barest of acknowledgements of the epidemic of rape 鈥?on the front cover of the Times Sunday Review section, ostensibly some lingering bastion of thought leadership 鈥?was misinformation, cherry-picked research and a series of inflammatory, basel
stanley cup ess arguments.The worst offense is Rubenfelds apparent belief that there is a debate to be had 鈥?as if there are two equal sides, both with reasonable and legitimate points. There are not. On the one side, there are the 20% of
