Auteur Sujet: wsbb Health care case seems likely to go on in court  (Lu 12 fois)

MethrenRaf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 161869
    • drwg The Quest TV Competition Turns Fantasy Into Reality Television
wsbb Health care case seems likely to go on in court
« le: Décembre 21, 2024, 04:52:05 pm »
Yvlt Every kid wants this game, so Sony adds Minecraft to new Playstation
 GENEVA A U.N. human rights expert on torture urged U.S. authorities Monday to end four decades of solitary confinement for a former Black Panther convicted of murdering a Louisiana prison guard.U.N. special rapporteur Juan Mendez said the indefinite solitary confinement imposed on Albert Woodfox  clearly amounts to torture and it should be lifted immediately. Woodfox, 66, and fellow prisoner Herman Wallace were serving unrelated sentences for armed robbery in 1972, when they were charged and convicted with fatally stabbing a guard.        The two men  stanley uk were moved to isolation in Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, then to  closed-cell restriction  at other state jails. Wallace died Friday at 71, only days after a federal judge freed him and ordered a new trial for him on the murder charge.Mendez, who reports to the U.N. s top human rights body in Geneva, said in a statement their cases  clearly show that the use of solitary confinement in the U.S. penitentiary system goes far beyond what is acceptable under international human rights law.             Woodfox and Wallace are two of three former Panthers known as the  Angola 3  who spent stanley isolierkanne  decades in isolation for periods of typically 23 hours a day.The third man, Robert King, was convicted of killing a fellow inmate in 1973, and released in 2001 after his conviction was reversed and he  had spent 29 years in solitary confinement.Woodfox and Wallace denied involvement in the guard s kill stanley cups ing, claiming they were targeted because  Yffa These Silk Scarves Are Patterned With Real Raindrops
 More stanley cups uk  than 150 years ago, the British government made smallpox vaccination compulsory, resulting in a massive political backlash. Opponents used tactics and arguments that are familiar today. If anything, the contemporary anti-vaxxer has regressed even further.     Widespread vaccination had begun in the early 1800s, after Edward Jenner presented his findings to the Royal Society of London in 1796, detailing his success in preventing smallpox by inoculation with infectious material. The Vaccination Act of 1853 made vaccination compulsory for all infants 鈥?parents who refused could face stiff fines and even imprisonment. Widespread resistance began almost immediately, with violent riots in several towns 鈥?some of which didn 8 stanley cup 217;t even enforce the law. A group called the Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League was formed, publishing journals and pamphlets about the dangers of vaccination. An editorial published in the October 9th, 1869 issue of the British Medical Journal, titled The Anti-Vaccination Agitators, expressed the frustration that is still felt in the medical community today: We fear it is not possible for any argument or any form of suasion to stay the tide of folly and ignorance which is now raging against one the most beneficent discoveries ever permitted to man. The chief actors in the anti-vaccination movement are men upon whom all statements of fact and argum stanley thermosflasche ent would be wasted. The platform spouters on this question are beyond our hope, and almost be