Gfnw After copyright takedown debacle, Ustream to rebroadcast the Hugo Awards on Sunday night
the last of the original Navajo 29, being honored at an April 4th ceremony. If it weren ;t for him and the other 28 Native Americans who created the secret code language used in the Pacific theater during World War II, America would have probably never won the war against Japan. Their work was so important that it remained secret for decades and it only recently鈥攊n 1968鈥攖hat they have started to receive some of the recognition they deserve. According to Major Howard Connor鈥?th Marine Division signal officer during the battle of Iwo Jima鈥攚ere it not for the Navajos, the Marines would never have taken Iwo Jima. Connor had six
stanley cup uk Navajo code talkers working around the clock during the first two days of the battle. Those six sent and received over 800 messages, all without error. Before the development of this code, Japanese intelligence broke every single encryption created by the US military, something that costed thousands of lives and millions of dollars in material losses. The Navajo code, however, was never broken. Not by the Japanese, not by anyone. Nez鈥攚ho fought at Guadalcanal, Bougainville, Guam, Peleliu and Angaur鈥攖ells the story here: We first 29 Code Talkers designed a doubly-encrypt
gourde stanley ed secret language using Navajo and English. It became
stanley cup website the only unbroken spoken code in modern warfare. Not even other Navajos could crack our code. Finally the Marines could plan strategic maneuvers without the enemy knowing every move. The code was a complete suc Rfgf These stunning maps were made entirely from geotagged tweets
reveals
stanley tumblers a draft legal framework which describes in detail the targeting of American citizens by drones without due process or proof of specific int
stanley cups ent to harm. That terrifying. The document, obtained by NBC News, explains that targets believed to be 8220 enior operational leader
of al-Qa ;ida or an associated force who pose an imminent threat can be targeted by US drones without the need for excessive quantities of paperwork or due process. The memo goes on to explain that an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government must determine that the target has recently been involved in activities posing a threat of a violent attack and there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities. The words rec stanley thermo ently and activities aren ;t defined, giving unlimited interpretive scope. Further limitations do apply; before the government can eradicate an American citizen with a fiery sky-death, capturing the person in question must be infeasible, and terminating the target must be performed according to the law of war principles. Well, that comforting, then. Less so is the vaguely defined use of the word imminence; the report explains that it does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will tak
