Ddrk Headless Man s Family Offers Mercy
Former District of Columbia Mayor Marion Barry pleaded guilty Friday to two misdemeanor counts stemming from his failure to file tax returns in 2000.Sentencing for Barry, a city councilman, was set for Jan. 18 in U.S. District Court. He pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts of willfully failing to file and failure to provide information.A plea agreement recommended probation. Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson freed Barry on his own recognizance but ordered him to inform federal authorities before leaving the area.Barry, 69, told the court that he was not sure how much money he earned between 1999 and 2004, conceding that tax forms provided by his employers may support the government s contention
stanley mugs that he earned $534,000.Barry served four terms as mayor. In his third term, he was videotaped in a hotel room smoking crack cocaine in an FBI sting. In 1991, he served a six-month prison sentence. Then, in 1994, he regained the mayor s office for another four-year term. The misdemeanor charges will not required Barry to give up his seat on the city council, where h
stanley puodelis e represents one of the city s poorest neighborhoods. Elected to the seat last year, he will qualify for pension benefits and a lifetime income if he completes his term in 2008.Barry earns $92,605 a year in his council post. He has served a total of 21 years in city gov
stanley cup ernment, including two previous council terms. ponent--type-recirculation .item Tbad Ring In the Autumn With Neil Young s Harvest
In past years, the peer-reviewed
stanley thermosflasche journal Nature has had to retract scientific papers at a rate of about one or two each year. But in the past two years it had to retract over a dozen. So what going on, science Academic papers tend to be retracted after publication for one of two reasons, either because of an honest error or on account of misconduct 鈥?a deliberate attempt to deceive. Clearly, the latter is far worse than the former. And in fact, the admittance of an honest error can sometimes bring credit. Scientific journals publish 20,000 fraudulent papers every year In 2013, Nature retracted six papers. This year, they ;ve al
stanley botella ready had to retract seven and the year ain ;t over yet . It a trend that not exclusive to this particular journal. Given this frust
vaso stanley rating trend, Nature editors have reviewed these and previous retractions to figure what going on. If science is broken, how do we fix it They found that most of Nature retractions came about through honest error, where authors have either discovered mistakes themselves after publication, or have had the errors brought to their attention and taken action. Also, the process of having a paper retracted can take years. And sometimes, when an institution and a journal both want a paper retracted, their interests in doing so sometimes collide. It often a long, arduous, and emotionally-charged process. So why the sudden pulse of Natur