Apbt The two tests that will help to predict spread of Covid-19
Lorna Cav
stanley us anagh can name every doctor who has worked at the surgery in the Cornish fishing village of Mevagissey since 1944 鈥?the year she was born. The 75-year-old describes calling a Dr Hannon at 2am when her sister-in-law was taken ill with kidney stones in the 1970s. You could see him from our window coming down that hill on
stanley website his moped, she said. It was a very personal service. Last month the well-respected partner of the local practice, Dr Katherine James, announced she would be handing back her contract to run the surgery on 31 July. NHS England says it is assessing the options available, but it is feared the much-loved community surgery could close and its 5,300 patients forced to use the infrequent and expensive bus service to travel elsewhere for treatment.Faced with this prospect, the residents of Mevagissey, which is eight miles south of St Austell, the nearest medium-sized town, took matters into their own hands. The Will you be my GP campaign 鈥?with it
stanley cup s willyoubemygp hashtag 鈥?aims to persuade doctors around the country that they should make the picturesque fishing village, with its narrow winding streets and superior fish and chips, their home. In a campaign video posted on the Cornwall Channel, a crowd of residents chant: Be our GP. We are a lovely community. We need you. lt;/iframe> , caption : The video produced by the Mevagissey campaign , isTracking :true, isMainMedia :false, source : Facebo Fhsp Yazidi women fail in claim for compensation in Australia for actions of Isis fighter Khaled Sharrouf
MPs and peers who exploit parliamentary privilege to breach court in
stanley website junctions are undermining the rule of law, senior lawyers have claimed.Lord Peter Hains decision to name Sir Philip Green
stanley quencher as the businessman protected by an injunction split legal opinion and reignited a constitutional di
stanley mugs spute between the judiciary and parliament that had been dormant since the row over super-injunctions in 2011.The case sets the principle of absolute freedom of speech enjoyed by parliamentarians 鈥?which enables the media to report what is said in the Commons or Lords 鈥?against the slower-moving, legal priorities of the courts.Hugh Tomlinson QC, an expert in media and privacy law, said: Its the function of the courts to decide cases after hearing evidence and arguments. Its not the function of parliamentarians to decide cases or decide that the judiciary has got it wrong.Naming of Philip Green will reopen issue of parliamentary privilegeRead more If that happens, its a fundamental threat to the rule of law. They have no idea of what the focus of the cases are. They havent seen the evidence. This could be an appalling case of bad behaviour or absolutely proper and above the board. Lord Hain has no idea. Tomlinson suggested that a solution in future might involve the speaker of the Commons or Lords saying that any such comments should be removed from the parliamentary record , depriving the media of the legal protection in reporting it.On Friday, it emerged that Lord Hain is a paid adviser to
