Zfzx Just enjoy your success, Kate Winslet. Your husband can take care of himself
Woke scientists want to shrink your PINT ! So read one of the more hysterical headlines last week about a study that removed pint glasses from several licensed premises in England and replaced them with two-thirds serves dropping the
stanley mugs prices accordingly . The study found that punters bought almost 10% less beer when pints werent available. If adopted nationwide, the researchers concluded, the strategy could reduce alcohol consumption and聽help tackle obesity.The Campaign for Real Ale Camra immediately
vaso stanley went on the offensive. The difficulty this study聽faced in even finding pubs to take part shows that the pint is still an in-demand measure for consumers at the bar, said Ash Corbett-Collins, Camras chair. With less than 1% of venues approached for the study agreeing聽to trial the smaller measure, and none of the 12聽pubs who did take part choosing to keep the change, the verdict from publicans is clear. Camra has a point: researchers asked more than 1,700 venues to take part in the study and managed to persuade just 13 one was excluded from the results because it continued to sell
stanley website pints alongside two-thirds measures . Were the researchers surprised that so few pubs wanted to get involved I was surprised that we were able to run the study at all, says Eleni Mantzari, a senior research associate from the Behaviour and Health Research Unit at the University of Cambridge. When we spoke to pubs and bars pre鈥慍ovid, none wanted to take part. People dont want to mess with the聽pin Epcb This is as much about patient safety as pay : NHS faces wave of strikes as more unions vote
The Daily Express has apologised today in the high court and paid 拢45,000 damages to Inayat Bunglawala, an assistant secretary of the Muslim Council of Great Britain, after publishing an article linking him to death threats made against Prince Harry.Before Mr Justice Eady in the high court in London today, Adam Tudor, the lawy
stanley france er representing Bunglawala, said the front-page article published in the Daily Express on 1 March, headlined Target Harry 鈥?British fanatics threaten him , suggested his client was a fanatical, sneering extremist . Bunglawala subsequently pursued a libel action against the Daily Express s publisher, Express Newspapers.Tudor, from London law firm Carter-Ruck, told the court that Express Newspapers had now acknowledged the article had carried a incomplete quote from Bunglawala and that the allegations were false and should never have been published.Taken in the context of the article published by the Daily Express as a whole, he said, the incomplete quote would have been understood to suggest that Bunglawala, at the very least, condoned a terrorist attack upon Prince聽Harry, while the complete quote 鈥?which had been correctly
stanley cup reported in other media, had made it clear that Bunglawala hoped Prince Harry and his army colleagues would be brought home safely from Afghanistan. Taken as a whole, this article suggested that the claimant [Bunglawala] is a fanatical, sneering extremist who was inciting or, at the ve
stanley canada ry least, condoning a te
