Mvzf More states betting on legal gambling to help with financial troubles
California filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, alleging the e-commerce giant violated the state s antitrust and unfair competition laws by increasing prices across the state and stifled competition. In a news release, Attorney General Rob Bonta said Amazon requires third-party sellers to enter contracts that prohibit them from selling their products for a lower price on competitor s websites, like Walmart, Target, or eBay.Bonta said this practice has allowed Amazon to dominate the online marketplace by not allowing other retailers to compete. For years, California consumers have paid more for their online purchases because of Amazon s anticompetitive contracting practi
stanley cup ces, said Bonta in the news release. Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full well that they can t afford to say no. With other e-commerce platforms unable to compete on price, consumers turn to Amazon as a one-stop shop for all their purchases. This perpetuates Amazon s market dominance, allowing the company to make increasingly untenable demands on its merchants and costing consumers more at checkout across C
stanley drinking cup alifornia. According to the lawsuit, if the seller does offer their products elsewhere for a lower price, Amazon allegedly penalizes the merchant by possibly terminating or suspending them from selling on Amazon. The reality is: Many of the products we
stanley cup buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained, Bonta said in a statement Srlm 4 people overdose on cocaine, woman s face mauled by dog in Grafton, police say
Multiple reports say former President Donald Trumps attorney David Schoen was not telling the truth Friday when he said their team was not given the chance to revie
stanley cup w evidence presented by the House impeachment managers.While presenting their defense Friday afternoon, Schoen implied that he and his team
stanley cups uk were not able to review evidence in the case. He wondered out loud why the video had not been released earlier. President Trump and his counsel were given no opportunity to review evidence or question its propriety, Schoen said. He then showed a headline from a media report calling the footage never seen before. Why was this footage never seen before Shouldnt the subject of an impeachment trial, this impeachment trial, President Trump, have the right to see the so-called new evidence against him Schoen asked during his arguments.However, shortly after he made the statement, multiple media outlets, including Yamiche Alcindor at PBS, co
stanley us nfirmed House managers shared all evidence they planned to present with the defense. The two sides had agreed to trial rules that included sharing evidence before the trial started. CONFIRMED: A source close to House Managers tells me that David Schoen was not telling the truth when he said Trumps lawyers had not been given the new video evidence of the Capitol attack. That person says trial rules required giving Trump lawyers the videos before the start.mdash; Yamiche Alcindor @Yamiche February 12, 2021 A source told repor