Nwpd Eyeing LS polls, Amit Shah to attend BJP meeting in Telangana today
New Delhi: The Supreme Court laid down guidelines against disparaging portrayal of persons with disabilities in visual media and films on Monday, saying that terms such as cripple and 8220 pastic have acquired devalued meanings in societal perceptions. The verdict came on a plea filed by one Nipun Malhotra, who submitted that the Hindi film Aankh Micholi ; contained deprecatory references to differently abled persons. P
stanley uk ronoun
stanley canada cing the verdict, a bench headed by Chief
stanley cup Justice D Y Chandrachud said, Words cultivate institutional discrimination and terms such as cripple and spastic have come to acquire devalued meanings in societal perceptions about persons with disabilities. Also ReadSC to hear on Monday batch of pleas related to controversy-ridden NEET-UG 2024 Laying down several guidelines, the bench said the film certification body CBFC must invite the opinion of experts before allowing screening. Visual media should strive to depict diverse realities of persons with disabilities, showcasing not only their challenges but also successes, talents and contribution to society. They should neither be lampooned based on myths nor presented as super cripples, it added. TagsIndia Supreme Court Press Trust of India Follow on Twitter | Posted by Neha Khan | Published: 8th July 2024 11:55 am IST Facebook X LinkedIn Pinterest Messenger Messenger W Hevt Etihad Airways ordered to refund airfare to Hyderabad man
Kochi: Watching pornographic photographs or videos in one private time without showing it to others is not an offence under the law as it is a matter of personal choice, the Kerala High Court has held. The high court said that declaring such an act as an offence would amount to intrusion of a person privacy and interference with his personal choice. The ruling by Justice P V Kunhikrishnan came while quashing a case of obscenity under Sect
stanley cup uk ion 292 of the Indian Penal Code against a 33-year-old man who was back in 2016 caught by police while watching porn videos on his mobile phone on the roadside near the Aluva palace here. The order and ruling came on the accu
stanley tazza sed person plea to quash the FIR and the court proc
stanley cup eedings against him in connection with that. The court said pornography was in practice for centuries and the new digital age has made it more accessible, even to children. The question to be decided in this case is whether a person watching a porn video in his private time without exhibiting it to others amounts to an offence A court of law cannot declare that the same amounts to an offence for the simple reason that it is his private choice and interference with the same amounts to an intrusion of his privacy, it said. The court also noted that there was no allegation that the petitioner accused publicly exhibited the video. I am of the considered opinion that watching an obscene photo by a person in his privacy