Xfcb American Red Cross offers donation incentive amid blood shortage
A study published by researchers fromthe Ohio State Universityshows that few people rejoice in the death of anti-vaxxers, but there are some who lack empathy toward them.The study was
stanley cup inspired by theHerman Cain Awardforum on Reddit. The subreddit often shares stories of those publicly declaring opposition to COVID-19 vaccines or social distancing efforts before becoming significantly ill with the virus.Herman Cain was a former presidential candidate who died in July 2020 with COVID-19 10 days after attending a rally for then-President Donald Trump.The researchers found that 4.6% of those surveyed said those who refused to get the vaccine deserved to die. We have people who are judging anti-vaxxers and considering them deserving of some level of suffering, but on the other hand, theres very little positive emotion about watching them suffer, study co-author Rebecca Frazer said in a press release.SEE MORE: Brain fog from long COVID is similar to aging 10 years, study findsThe researchers presented mock Facebook status updates from someone named Terry Adams. One of the posts expressed uncertainty about the COVID
stanley cup -19 vaccine. In this case, researchers found most people were understanding of Adams.But when Adam
stanley cup s later authored posts about contracting COVID-19, the response from some depended on whether Adams regretted not getting the vaccine. The researchers noted that 63% of Democrats and 80% of Republicans thought people like Adams deserved a full recovery. Republicans were more Bqjx Coping with suicide: Surviving the loss of a loved one
WASHINGTON, D.C. 鈥?Two conservative Supreme Court justices are taking aim at the landmark case that legalized same-sex marriage across the U.S. in 2015.Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito released a four-page opinion Monday about the religious liberty implications from the
stanley cup Obergefell v. Hodges decision.Thomas and Alito argue that the decision threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and woman. Due to Obergefell, those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Obergefell and its effect on other antidiscrimination laws, wrote the justices.Thomas and Alito were among the four justices who voted against legalizi
stanley thermos mug ng same-sex marriage five years ago, arguing that it should have been left to the states to the decide. If the states had been allowed to resolve this question through legislat
stanley en mexico ion, they could have included accommodations for those who hold these religious beliefs, they wrote.Mondays opinion came as the court declined to hear the case involving Kentucky clerk Kim Davis, who made headlines in 2015 as she declined marriage licenses to gay couples, despite the Supreme Court ruling. Thomas wrote that he agreed with not taking up the case, because it didnt cleanly present important questions raised about Obergefell v. Hodges.In their opinion, Thomas and Alito say Davis may have been one of the firs
