Prsz Mark Meadows loses appeal seeking to move Georgia election case to federal court
In the wake of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg s death, millions of Americans wondered what the future of abortion access might look like. They won t wait long to find out.Any day now, the current eight-justice Supreme Court is expected to issue its first decision on abortion access. The case, Food and Drug Administration v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, considers abortion via pill and whether patients, in the midst of a deadly pandemic, should still be required to make an in-per
stanley tumbler son trip to a doctor s office in order to receive the medication.In front of the high court is whether to reverse lower courts preliminary injunctions that have temporarily suspended the FDA s in-person rule.Though the case doesn t directly chal
stanley mug lenge Roe v. Wade, the 1973 S
stanley cups uk upreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, it promises to alter the way patients access the procedure and offers a glimpse into the future of a post-Ginsburg court. It s clear that the future to the right to abortion is in serious peril, and our ability to get a safe, legal abortion is likely dependent on the next justice confirmed to the court, Julia Kaye, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union and lead counsel challenging the FDA s regulation, said Friday in a telephone interview with CBS News.At the outset of the coronavirus pandemic, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists ACOG , a professional medical organization, requested that the FDA lift a long-standing require Keew For Better Or Worse, Few Elections Bring About Reform
AP Democrats have spent a lot of time hammering the Roberts Court for its 5-4 decision to allow unlimited spending by corporations and unions on political advertising. Wasn t it unusual how they got to the point where they can make
stanley termosky that decision, based on the facts Sen. Russell Feingold pressed Kagan. It was unusual wasn t it Kagan, of course, defended the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law in the Court, in the case Citizens United v FEC. Then the President teed up the issue in his January State of the Union address, when he took a shot at the
stanley taza Court, as he put it, overturning nearly 100 years of precedent and for allowing corporations to drown out the voices of everyday Americans. He warned it would also inject foreign corporate money into elections.And that prompted that dramatic moment, when the cameras caught Justice Alito shaking his head and mouthing the words, that s not true. But Alito had a point that is still being missed - intentionally or not - by Democrats.The key issue in Citizens United was whether corporations and unions could directly fund televisi
stanley thermos mug on ads in the weeks leading up to an election, urging the public to vote for or against a political candidate. The Court held that corporations could fund those messages directly, instead of just contributing to a political action committee.The 100 years of precedent that President Obama referred to in the State o
