Jbpf Steve Mostyn, Democratic mega-donor, dies at 46
George Nader, a top United Arab Emirates adviser who
stanley becher was a witness in special counsel Robert Mueller s investigation, remains in custody Thursday night after the judge decided to schedule a detention hearing to take place Friday.Nader was charged with one count of child pornography. If convicted, Nader faces a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison.Nader was present in the Alexandria, Virginia federal court Thursday. He spoke softly when answering Judge Ivan Davis questions. Nader wore an olive prison uniform with a navy undershirt. He is accused of transporting child pornography. The charging document says that in January 2018, after a flight from Dubai, Nader was stopped at Washington-Dulles Airport for questioning by the FBI on an unrelated matter. While searching the three phones Nader had declared, the FBI agent uncovered several files containing child pornography.Nader, a Lebanese-American businessman was interviewed by the special counsel about whether he had funneled money from the United Arab Emirates to Donald Trump
stanley quencher s election efforts. According to the New York Times, Nader was also present at a 2017 meeting in the Seychellse involving Blackwater founder and informal Trump adviser Erik Prince and a Russian associate of Vladimir Putin. This is the third time Nader has faced child pornography charges. In 1991 he pleaded guilty to the same charge, after two reels of videotape hidden in ca
stanley cup ndy tins were seized from him at Du Vyhi Obama to kick off jobs tour in Austin
AP This coming Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case involving the coal royalty rights of the Navajo Nation. It will be the second time the Justices have involved themselves in the dispute. The first time, in 2003, the Court sided with the government, that is to say the Interior Department, which at the request of an energy corporation had blocked a royalty increase to the Nation.The case was then sent back down to the Federal Circuit Court for a new look. In 2007, that lower appeals court again sided with the Navajo people, ruling that the government had breached its fiduciary duty to the Nation. The Bush Administration again appealed, arguing that a ruling in favor of the tribe would encourage the filing of other claims against the Interior Department. And, last fall, the Supreme Court yet again expressed through its certiorari process the means by which the Court typically agrees to accept certain cases and reject others a willingness to step in and save the feds in their fight against the tribe.Whi
stanley becher le the merits of the case are complex, it is a virtual certai
termo stanley nty that the Court s majority will once again reject the claims of the Navajos. That alone might be cause for some serious discussion about the relationship between the Court and American Indians. But thanks to an important study by Michigan State University Law Professor Matthew L.M. Fletcher we now know that there may be a problem that goes way beyond this sin
stanley trinkflaschen gle case.Fletcher
