Ufgg Scandalous: The First On-Screen Kiss
Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie, the co-CEO bro team who oversaw the implosion of RIM and the complete descent into irrelevance of the BlackBerry, aren ;t shedding any tears right now. Why Despite career failure, they got a luxury parting package. The Wall Street Journal reports the golden parachute stud
stanley tumblers ded with rubies was disclosed in RIM latest filing with the SEC鈥攁nd boy, it pretty disgusting. As the WSJ points out, RIM was worth a staggering 16 times what it worth today, five years ago. Who was in charge during those five years, when the company plugged its ears against the inexorable trend of the iPhone and churned out crappy handsets Mike and Jim. So what are they getting for their years of disservice Plenty of money that could ;ve been spent on hiring some talent to save the whole ship: Balsillie was given a payout of $7.93 million for the current fiscal year, which includes salary, bonus and a severance package valued at about $4.8 million. Lazaridis received $3.96 million in salary and awards, as well as a 10-year extension
stanley quencher on healt
stanley us h coverage for himself and his family, and a company car and driver. In other words, enough money to last them several lifetimes over without ever having to work again, in exchange for having done terrible work. And should they ever want to visit any of the employees laid off or surely waiting to be laid off in the near future, they can just take Mike permanent private car service. The Cana Lyku Right now, people are living in a Mars colony 鈥?here s what it looks like
Gizmodo is not objective. It never has been, I don ;t think. And I hope it never will be. Becaus
stanley cup e the point isn ;t to be something as meaningless鈥攁nd frankly, false鈥攁s objective. The point is to tell the truth. And sometimes, the truth comes with a point of view. A widespread, mealy-mouthed obsession with the appearance of objectivity is why the public ed
stanley cup itor of the New York Times asked, straight faced,
stanley tumbler 8220;whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge facts ; that are asserted by newsmakers they write about in response to readers who are fed up with the distortions and evasions that are common in public life, [and] look to The Times to set the record straight. The Times is so concerned with appearing objective鈥攑articularly in the realm of politics鈥攖hat it dare not correct a fact that is a lie, just to avoid looking like it taking sides. Even if one of the sides is dead wrong. It why sometimes even the truth sometimes gets represented as lie, why the ridiculous ravings of Donald Trump about birth certificates are presented with the same credibility as real public figures. To seem objective. But objectivity, very often, is bullshit. Even science, which proclaims to be objective more than any other discipline, is very often not, unable to decide whether or not coffee will kill you鈥攐r more tragically, has been systematically deployed over and over in history in the service of racism
