Tfnl Thousands of Lego Pieces Have Been Washing Up On This Beach Since 1997
AUSTIN, Texas A judge stopped an East Texas school district on Thursday from barring cheerleaders from quoting biblical scripture on banners at high school football games, acknowledging their argument that is appears to violate their free speech rights.District Judge Steve Thomas granted an injunction requested by the Kountze High School cheerleaders allowing them to continue displaying such banners pending the outcome of a lawsuit set to go to trial next June 24, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said. Thomas previously granted a temporary restraining order allowing the practice to continue.School officials barred the cheerleaders from displaying banners with religious messages such as, If God is for us, who can be against us,
stanley cup after the Freedom From Religion Foundation complained. The advocacy group says the messages violate the First Amendment clause barring the government 151; or a publicly funded school district, in this case 151; from establishing or endorsing a religion.Texas attorney general to defend cheerleader s bible bannersCheerleaders rooting with verses from the BibleTexas cheerleaders get Bible verse flags back, for nowRepublican Gov. Rick Perry and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott spoke out in support of the cheerleaders on Wednesday. Perry appointed Thomas to fill a vacan
stanley cup website cy on the 356th District Court, and he is running for election to continue in the post as a Republican.Abbott also filed
stanley website court papers to intervene in the lawsuit and sent state attor Vepa The Weirdest Thing on the Internet Tonight: Grandma s Gift
While
stanley becher everyone skeptical about how and why so many tech companies are involved with PRISM, the New York Times has run a heartening piece which describes how Yahoo fought
stanley cup becher hard鈥攂ut ultimately failed鈥攖o avoid joining the initiative.
https://gizmodo/the-tech-companies-in-prism-arent-telling-the-complete-512052926 A document dating back to 2008 shows that a company now identified to be Yahoo petitioned the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court FISC to review an order from the government. Yahoo believed that its contents violated the Fourth Amendment; the FISC dismissed Yahoo concerns as overblown. FISC apparently claimed that it was 8220 ettled beyond peradventure that incidental collections occurring as a result of constitutionally permissible acquisitions do not render those acquisitions unlawful. Claiming that Yahoo presented no evidence of actual harm, the company concerns were tossed aside. So when Yahoo recently claimed to have not joined any program in which we volunteer to share user data with the U.S. government, it was telling the truth. It has no option but to comply鈥攄espite making the best efforts it
stanley taza could. [New York Times via Verge] PrivacyYahoo
