Auteur Sujet: dpjm What The Hell Is Deathlok Wearing On Agents Of SHIELD  (Lu 16 fois)

MethrenRaf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 161869
    • drwg The Quest TV Competition Turns Fantasy Into Reality Television
dpjm What The Hell Is Deathlok Wearing On Agents Of SHIELD
« le: Janvier 15, 2025, 07:21:31 am »
Udbp The NSA Has Been Ordered To Disclose How Much Water It Uses
 However: The lack of representation is particu stanley cup uk larly unsettling when security, peace, and disarmament are the issues on the table. Legalizing lethal robots would elevate the ease of killing to an unprecedented level鈥攊t   not a decision you want to leave half the world   population out of. Somehow it implies that women are not capable of being seriously involved in creating our own security in a secure world, Nobel Laureate Jody Williams told me in a phone call from Geneva, where the first UN debate on the fate of killer robots is underway. To be blunt, I find it f**king offensive. Williams is stanley termos  one of two speakers to point out the gender disparity to the delegation of 50 governments on opening day yesterday鈥攖he other being the representative from Norway. She was awar gourde stanley ded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 for spearheading the successful effort to ban land mines, and is now chair of the Nobel Women   Initiative and a member of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots 8230;. So what to do about it  [Simply] pointing out the lack of diversity at the conference鈥攅thnic diversity, too鈥攊s a start. The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots has also compiled a list of female experts on lethal robots to make it easier for the UN Convention on Conventional Weapons to include a more gender-balanced perspective next time around. Just keep nipping at their heels, Williams said. Peacefully, of course. Via Motherboard                       Svuv The Best DVR Feature Yet: Dish Network Lets You Automatically Skip All Commercials
 In a blog post, Wolfram discusses the many layers of information he   been able to compute from the raw data. Much of it is a pretty theoretical analysis of how we connect with an emphasis on pretty standard demographic indicators like age and location. It starts to get interesting when Wolfram starts to tackle more qualitative aspects of the data using natural language analysis, which he can use to figure out how your interests stanley tumblers  change over time. How does he do it  Once you ;ve got a good engine for crunching language  as opposed to keywords  it   easy enough to figure out what broad topics people talk about the most. From the stanley hrnek re, Wolfram calculates with what frequency people in different age groups are talking about certain topics. He then plots those frequencies as trajectories over time.  In case it   not obvious, the red line refers to women and the blue line referes to men.  And, man, isn ;t it just so hard not  stanley becher to read way too much into these numbers  Actually, not even. The charts are mostly surprising for how obvious the conclusions are. Nearly every chart passes the smell test, although, it   hard to try to explain it all without making some assumptions. Like it makes sense that we ;d be more interested in inspirational quotes, philosophy, and in matters of health as we get older and are forced to confront our mortality. Is that fair  These aren ;t perfect models for our interests, but with a little more crunching, you could