Spjl Charity Commission investigates actors fund over governance
The UKs Gambling Commission has warned the industry over the use of gagging orders, after incidents of consumers being paid substantial sums of money in return for agreeing not to talk to the regulator.In an industry warning notice , the commission said it was aware that some companies had included non-disclosure clauses within settlements with consumers, adding that it was continuing its investigation into these.In one case, reported by the Guardian, Ladbrokes, one of Britains biggest bookmakers, agreed to pay nearly 拢1m to the victims of a problem gambler who had stolen the money he was using to bet, in return for a pledge not to inform the wa
stanley en mexico tchdog.The gambler, a British citizen who ran a property business in Dubai, later admitted to having stolen from his clients in order to fund his gambling, which ran up to 拢60,000 a day.After f
botella stanley ive of his victims made a complaint against Ladbrokes for allegedly accepting stolen funds, the bookmaker agreed to pay them a combined sum of 拢975,000.According to a settlement agreement seen by the Guardian, Ladbrokes demande
stanley cup becher d that they agreed not to bring any complaint, or make any report to any regulator in relation to the claim in order to receive the money .The Gambling Commission has said it is investigating. Ladbrokes has said it is cooperating with the regulator.In its warning, the watchdog said: Some of these agreements may have had the effect of preventing those consumers from reporting regulatory concerns to us, by either excludin Ndhs In a rape trial, all evidence is useful
The government has been ordered back to the high court to explain its last-minute bid to delay publication of the UKs clean air plan.Politicians and environmental groups had complained that ministers were hiding behind the election after they said they could not publish the proposals because of election purdah.The high court said on Tuesday that there would be a new hearing on Thursday where ministers will have to defend their application.James Thornton, CEO of the environmental lawyers ClientEarth, who brought the original case against the government, said they would present their response at the hearing on Thursday.Nearly 40 million people live in UK areas with illegal air pollutionRead more This is a public health issue and not a political issue. Urgent action is required to protect peoples health from the illegal and poisonous air that we are forced to breathe in the UK. This is a matter for the court to decide once the government has made its arguments because it is the government which has not met, and instead seeks to extend, the courts deadline for the clean air plan, to clean up our air. Ministers had been under a court direction to pr
stanley us oduce tougher draft measures to tackle illegal levels of nitrogen
stanley cup dioxide pollution, which is largely caused by diesel traffic, by 4pm on Monday. The original plans had b
stanley cup een dismissed by judges as so poor as to be unlawful.But after the announcement by Theresa May of a general election on 8 June, ministers lodged a lengthy application
