Hitg Microsoft Devs Built a Basic Version of Windows Optimized for Steam Deck
this week. The law in question mandates that a cable system operator shall offer subscribers the option of purchasing access to cable channels, or programs on cable channels, individually. According to the Daily News, the bill was sponsored by Independent state Representative Jeff Evangelos and passed largely along party lines ; Democratic Governor Janet Mills did not sign the bill, but allowed it to be passed into law. Comcast and the other companies are suing to prevent its implementation on Sept. 19, arguing that it is preempted by federal law The Federal Communications Commission, however, indicated in a letter to state officials that it views the matter as unsettled: Evangelos defended the proposal by telling WGME in March, I want to watch the Red Sox, but I dont want to watch [televangelist] Jimmy Swaggart, so I shouldnt be forced to pay for that. Comcast and Charter Communications argued it was preempted by federal law. Maine Public Advocate Barry Hobbins noted that providers had successfully argued that in other deb
stanley tumblers ates in the past, but the Federal Communications Commission told Hobbins in a letter that whether the state law would be preempted was a question of first impression and there we
stanley cup re no commission rulings that address the a la carte issue. Advocates of the law have also pointed to an FCC statement that says There is no law that requires or
stanley cup prohibits cable companies to offer channels or programs on an 脿 la carte basis. The companies lawsuit, fil Cgka There s a Reddit Clone Phishing People Who Type Too Fast
The law made it a misdemeanor in the state to post intimate photos of someone online without their consent. Defendants would be charged with up to a year in jail and fined up to $4,000. However, Chief Justice James Worthen ruled on Wednesday that the bill violated First Amendment rights, which prohibits limitations on freedom of expression unless the government has a strong interest in the content. As the Austin-American Statesman reports, prosecutors disputed this by arguing the government has an interest in ensuring peoples expectations of privacy are protected. But the appeals court ultimately ruled that the law was too broad, punishing unwitting third parties. Worthen cited a person who forwards a nude photo of a stranger, unaware that the person wanted to keep it private, as an example. Heres the hypothetical from the ruling, in full
stanley cup usa : Adam and Barbara are in a committed relationship. One evening, in their home, during a moment of passion, Adam asks Barbara if he can take a nude photograph of her. Barbara consents, but before Adam takes the picture, she tells him that he must not show the photograph to anyone else. Adam promises that he will never show the picture to another liv
stanley mug ing soul, and takes a photograph of Barbara in front of a plain, white background with her breasts exposed. A few months pass, and Adam and Barbara break up after Adam discovers that Barbara has had an affair. A few weeks later, Adam rediscovers the topless photo he took of Barbara. Feeling
stanley cup ang
